Skip to content →

Does ViaBTC have veto power over Segwit activation?

ViaBTC mining power distribution

Segregated Witness or Bitcoin Core release 13.1 has been released! This update promises to end a 2 year civil war within Bitcoin’s community over scaling, which unresolved,  poses a systemic risk to the network.

To the investor, the war has almost certainly had a bearish influence on bitcoin price. But before we can celebrate, Segwit only turns on when a minimum 95% of the last 2016 blocks have been mined with the Segwit code.

Now most people are jumping to the conclusion that any mining pool with more than 5% of the network’s mining power will have veto power to block Segwit from activating. It just so happens that the mining pool ViaBTC, who are fans of Bitcoin Unlimited, are opposing to Segwit. They control 6.7% of hashing power at the time of writing (Source: blockchain.info).

Does this mean Segwit is at a stalemate?

Not quite, and here is why…

Clearly, even if you only had 1% of mining power, there’s a chance, ever so slim, but a valid chance you might mine 1915 blocks out of the last 2016 if you get to roll the dice a sufficient number of times. The question is how many times? And long will you be waiting?

I ran some probability calculations* to determine how long we’d need to wait vs mining power to get a 50% chance of activation. The results are below:

Mining power needed for Bitcoin Segwit Activation

Turns out 93% of mining power is the magic number. At 93% we have 50% chance of activating within a month** (75% chance after 2 months, 87.5% after 3 months, etc.)

This just so happens to just pip ViaBTC’s 6.7% control of the network. Whether ViaBTC can gain more hashing power or not has yet to be seen, but join me in grabbing some popcorn and refreshing  the Bitcoin Core’s Segwit tracking page – we are  in for an interesting few months…

 

* I calculated my results using a binomial probability distribution calculator. I’m not an expert in probabilities, it’d be cool if someone more expert verifies my results.

** The quoted time excludes the first 2 weeks we’d have to wait for the first 2016 blocks to be mined.

 

I have a lot of brain-farts on crypto-currency. For more farting, follow me on Twitter @dangermouse117

BTC Tips: 1KrYzd8y6gnJekibZpb4ixif4nJYbaaZct

Published in Uncategorized

One Comment

  1. Jacob Eliosoff Jacob Eliosoff

    Not a huge criticism, but the obstacle is not just ViaBTC, but the considerably wider category of non-segwit miners:

    1. ViaBTC is only the biggest pool/miner running BU: there are also smaller ones, like Bitcoin.com (~2%) and (partly) Slush.
    2. Then there are another 1-2% still running Bitcoin Classic.
    3. And of course the 80+% of Core miners that haven’t yet upgraded to support segwit, some unknown fraction of which probably never intend to.

    What’s your source for the ViaBTC/BU hashrate stats? https://coin.dance/blocks? The BU hashrate there oscillates, but it’s usually above 9% and I’ve never seen it below 7%. (Of the last 1,000 blocks, 92 = 9.2% were BU and 13 = 1.3% Classic.)

    So yes, segwit might be able to sneak through with only 93-94% support. But even that still looks like a stretch at the moment.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *